On Monday, President Trump announced not only his new “travel restrictions” but also that there were up to 300 refugees being investigated by the FBI on terrorist charges. Never a paper to let a good story go to waste, the New York Times wasted no time in coming out with some spin that was so carefully crafted, and so precise in its language, that many would be forgiven for thinking that refugees HAVE NOT attacked US citizens on US soil.
The full statement as reported by the YoungCons looks like this:
Really? Orlando, just the one Muslim extremist terrorist attack, had 49 people killed and 53 wounded. Not to mention the numbers killed in San Bernardino (14), Chattanooga (4), Boston (4 including police officer after the bombing) and a slew of smaller lesser known attacks.
We could also throw in honor killings for that matter, another form of Muslim extremist murder.
No attacks came from the banned countries?
Apparently, Thrush has already forgotten about the attack in November by a Somali refugee in Ohio who ran his car into a crowd and then jumped out with a knife? On social media, he tied his attack to anger at America for actions in Muslim countries. How about the Somali refugee who in September yelled “Allahu Akbar” and knifed nine people in a Minnesota mall?