The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the details of Donald Trump’s Travel Ban in a decision that was 9-0. This means that although it is not yet law, the policy will stand until they hear the case in October.
The provisions mean that immigration will only be allowed for those that have “genuine” ties to the US (such as family members), and will allow Trump 90 days to figure out a proper, Constitutional form of vetting.
Already the Left are exploding in indignation at the Supreme Court’s decision. But few are picking up on the fact that the 9th Circuit Judges have been completely overruled. Does this mean that the 9th Circuit was completely wrong? Or does it mean that they were behaving like activists as opposed to judges?
As reported in the Daily Caller:
The decision allows most of Trump’s so-called “travel ban” to take effect until the Supreme Court hears arguments in fall. The court will allow enforcement of the executive order unless the travelers have a “credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.”
“As President, I cannot allow people into our country who want to do us harm. I want people who can love the United States and all of its citizens, and who will be hardworking and productive,” Trump said.
“My number one responsibility as Commander in Chief is to keep the American people safe. Today’s ruling allows me to use an important tool for protecting our Nation’s homeland. I am also particularly gratified that the Supreme Court’s decision was 9-0.”