Last week, TV personality Dr. Drew Pinsky said he was “gravely concerned” about Hillary Clinton’s health. In an interview, Drew based his concerns on what he called an “exceedingly rare clot” sustained from her 2012 concussion and the “archaic” treatments she’s receiving.
Photos of Clinton appearing to require support just to stand up have swirled over social media, as has this video showing some pretty strange behavior which some say is a seizure.
Naturally, those on the left are trying to quash any rumors about her health. In fact, a tech writer at the New York Times went so far as to say that Google should censor search results that thwart “conspiracy theorists.”
— Farhad Manjoo (@fmanjoo) August 21, 2016
However, another doctor has gone on record regarding Hillary’s health and says “it’s not a conspiracy theory.”
In an interview on Fox News, Rutgers University Professor of Medicine Bob Lahita says Clinton should be assessed by an impartial panel of physicians.
Per Infowars, Lahita told Fox Business that he agreed with Dr. Drew on several points about Hillary’s health.
“This is a very unusual story with Hillary,” said Lahita, making reference to her suffering two blood clots, a stroke and post-concussive syndrome, which caused Hillary to have to wear special prism glasses to counter her double vision.
“The very fact that she’s having these clots and she’s had two bouts of thrombosis is disconcerting to say the least,” said Lahita.
Asked whether the concerns over Hillary’s health were objectively authentic regardless of politics or whether the leftist media were right to label the issue a conspiracy theory, Lahita responded, “I don’t think it’s a conspiracy.”
“You go back to the history of our presidents and we’ve had many presidents up until Lyndon Johnson who’ve concealed their health during their campaigns and it had dire effects for our country, going from Kennedy to Roosevelt, to Woodrow Wilson whose wife ran the White House for some time – so we have issues here and I think both candidates should be very forthcoming and perhaps have an impartial panel of physicians review the data and make that kind of decision before Americans go to the polls,” remarked Lahita.
Dr. Lahita also dismissed claims by the media that a summary released last year by Hillary’s personal physician Dr. Lisa R. Bardack saying she was in good health was enough to satisfy questions over Clinton’s fitness to serve as president.
Calling for a more recent assessment, Lahita said, “We should be able to see the laboratory results ourselves, the letter is kind of a summary (it) doesn’t go into much detail,” adding that more information on Hillary’s hypothyroidism would also be “quite interesting.”
“We owe it to the country, we owe it to the voters, not only for the presidential candidates, but also for the vice-presidential candidates – particularly in this election,” concluded Lahita.